Coverage and limits

Where this data is strong, where it is weak, and what it cannot see at all.

Our lists are smaller than the biggest vendors'. We would rather tell you that here than have you find it after buying.

What we hold

Registrable domains crawled monthly12,081,787
Domains profiled in depth (top 1M by traffic)716,977
Technologies observed4,015
Average technologies detected per prospect17.3
Historymonthly, back to 2011

Where competitors beat us

Coverage. Vendors running their own crawler index more sites. On the technologies we have compared directly, we hold 46–65% of BuiltWith's top-1M counts. If completeness is what you need, buy theirs.

Freshness. One crawl a month, published 4–6 weeks after the month it covers. Nobody should use this for same-week triggers.

Large enterprises. Coverage falls sharply at the very top. Big organisations run marketing and commerce on subdomains a homepage crawl never sees. This data is strongest in the mid-market and thin above it.

Contacts. We do not sell contact records. We verify addresses you already hold.

Contact fields are sparse — here are the real rates

These come from each prospect's own published structured data, so they are free but patchy. Measured on the current crawl, not estimated:

technology_stack100.0%
description50.7%
social12.7%
title10.6%
phone3.9%
linkedin_url3.5%
locality3.4%

A phone number on 3.9% of rows is not a phone column, and we do not present it as one. These rates ship inside every API response and CSV.

Feeds we withhold

A technology losing a large share of its install base every month is exhibiting detection failure, not customer behaviour. We compute implied churn against the whole crawl each month and withhold the feeds that fail it — 7 outright, 23 flagged. Mautic reads 265% monthly churn and Shopify Chat 174%, which is why neither is sellable as a feed however large its install base. The screen can only reject; passing it means nothing is provably broken, not that a feed is verified.

Contact coverage varies by segment

Named contacts are licensed, not observed in the crawl, and the source is strongest on US companies. One headline number would mislead in one direction or the other, so here is the whole distribution.

US mid-market — 11–500 employees77.7%
Mid-market, any country28.0%
Any company with a firmographic record24.1%
Every domain we profile9.0%

By country: 67.9% of US domains, 20.8% India, 16.4% United Kingdom, 9.9% Germany. A European list will carry far fewer named contacts than a US one, and the builder shows the count for the exact set you have selected before you pay for it.

What we cannot see at all

Smaller, but from a source you can audit yourself and a history nobody else holds. That is the trade, stated up front. How the data is built →